🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold policy to prohibit social media access for those under 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Politicians, child protection groups, and families are watching intently to see if this approach will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Momentum

Across Europe, a growing chorus of nations are moving toward comparable bans.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM arguing that phones and networks are "robbing our kids' childhood". Legislation may be passed in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is set to enforce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to protect the young from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to confirm the age and identity of social media participants. The media minister have stated that an similar ban remains "a potential options in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has called on parliament to approve a proposal increasing the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has recommended a related step, including an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The government in the Netherlands has recommended families to block their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has approved a advisory statement demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 without parental consent is provided. While it highlights of the "habit-forming" quality of these platforms, the resolution does not establish binding law.

"An effective age limit is a useful foundation," commented one parliamentarian driving the initiative.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Stance

In the UK, the leadership has remained open to a possible ban, arguing that "no measure is being dismissed" but stressing any decision must be "based on strong research".

Previously, support built behind a bill to enact limits on social media use by minors, but it was eventually modified. Instead, the administration committed to further research the topic.

Advocacy groups have voiced concerns. One foundation established by the relatives of a girl who was lost after being exposed to harmful online content suggests that a strict age ban could fail to protect children and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of harm when young people become eligible.

"This ban is a reaction to the inability of the social media companies to create tools that are secure and age appropriate for minors," commented a influential child protection advocate.

The United States: A Fragmented Picture

Stateside, regulation is primarily unfolding at the local level amid federal gridlock.

• The state of Utah mandates guardian permission for minors to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has passed a measure banning children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a rule restricting minors to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with extra use needing parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted laws requiring parental consent for under-16s to set up social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from certain individuals to copy this example, a federal ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Outlook

Outside of Europe and the US, other countries are also taking action.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, international bodies adopt a more nuanced tone. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "may even have unintended consequences". The organization points out that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable youth and that government action should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to prioritize safety.

As this global debate unfolds, the actions of this nation and several other countries indicate that policymakers around the world are less and less willing to delay for platforms to self-regulate.